Evaluation of web pages

This table was created by Jim Kapoun, reference and instruction librarian at Southwest State university. Published in College and Research Libraries News. *July/August, 1998): 522-523.

Five Criteria for Evaluating Web pages
Evaluation of Web Documents
How to Interpret the Basics

1. Accuracy of Web Documents

  • Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?
  • What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced?
  • Is this person qualified to write this document?


  • Make sure author provides email or a contact address/phone number.
  • Know the distinction between author and Webmaster.

2. Authority of Web Documents

  • Who published the document and is it separate from the 'Webmaster"?
  • check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document?
  • Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?


  • What credentials are listed for the author(s)?
  • Where is the document published: Check URL domain.

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

  • What goals/objectives does this page meet?
  • How detailed is the information?
  • What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author?


  • Determine if page is a mask for advertising; if so information might be biased.
  • View any web page as you would an infomercial on television. Ask yourself why was this written and for whom?

4. Currency of Web Documents

  • When was it produced?
  • When was it updated?
  • What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author?


  • How many dead links are on the page?
  • Are the links current or updated regularly?
  • Is the information on the page outdated?

5. Coverage of the Web Documents

  • Are the links (if any) evaluated and do they complement the documents theme?
  • Is it all images or a balance of text and images?
  • Is the information presented cited correctly?


  • If page requires special software to view the information, how much are you missing if you don't have the software?
  • Is it free, or is there a fee, to obtain the information?
  • Is there an option for text only, or frames, or a suggested browser for a better viewing?

Putting it all together

  • Accuracy. If the page lists the author and institution that published the page and provides a way of contacting him/her, and ...
  • Authority. If the page lists the author credentials and its domain is preferred (.edu, .gov, .org, or .net) and ...
  • Objectivity. If the page provides accurate information wit limited advertising and it is objective in presenting the information, and ...
  • Currency. If the page is current and updated regularly (as stated on the page) and the links (if any) are also up-to-date, and ...
  • Coverage. If information can be viewed properly -- not limited to fees, browser technology, or software requirements, then ...


Five Criteria for Evaluating Web Pages handout

Evaluation of a book or an article would be very similar as a webpage.